Thread:Megistos86/@comment-38735297-20200505074805/@comment-1706203-20200506183150

Megistos86 wrote: It is not confirmed that TUM is or is not canon, and at no time have I put the elements of TUM on the main timeline, so I do not understand your complaint here. As I said, my opinion about canonicity TUM is just that, a personal opinion.

I'm not saying that you put TUM stuff on the timeline. I'm saying Battles and Event pages were created and refined with the intention of establishing a timeline. Therefore anything that doesn't fall into the timeline shouldn't get a page.

On the other hand, I disagree with your arguments about why TUM battles should not have their own pages.

First, people visit the wiki for the information it contains, and I think the more the better. Of course i’m not asking to create pages for absolutely every single stuff of the MHA, but I see no problem in creating pages that give more detailed information on certain aspects and events.

The more information the better doesn't apply when you're repreating information. So far, each TUM chapter revolves aorund a singular event/mission/battle. The battle pages are essentially the same thing minus the character interactions. It doesn't add anything to the wiki. Doesn't add to the timeline and like I said the articles are in bad shape in their current shape. More isn't always better. It's about quality not quantity.

Secondly, for the navbox we can simply use the ones we already have in the TUM chapters and add a section for the battles, just as we has been done with the Vigilante battles for a long time. And for color pages, it is something more aesthetic than a necessity, and there are lot of articles in the wiki that have not had their own "color page" for a long time (some still do not have it), and no one has gotten mad about it.

Navboxes/Colors were just examples for extra resources for another aspect of the series that once again IS NOT CANON and completely unnecessary. Anything that doesn't have a color assigned to it should eventually or else it looks out of place and inconsistent.

And finally, and please do not be angry about what I am going to say, but your argument that "non-canon battles should not have their own articles, could be represented well with just the chapter pages, it's bad to include non-canon pages in character battle categories, etc..." can be applied to many “anime filler battles” pages, several of which you have created.

If you're talking about pages like Asui & Selkie vs. Innsmouth or Todoroki vs. Seijin Students.. nice try but that's not at all the same thing. You're the one who created the "Swimming Competition" page after all, which serves no real purpose. At least the fights were included to expand parts of the Hero Killer Arc/Exam Arc.

Regardless, all these pages fall into the anime's timeline, even the swimming competition. TUM does nothing of the sort so no what I said about OVA's and filler it cannot be applied to anime filler battles because they're placed within the established timeline. Also HK supervises the anime and those changers were all canon approved.

I'm not mad or even arguing I'm just stating what I think. It's good to have discourse and I genuinely think TUM Battle pages is bad and unesseccary idea.