Thread:Megistos86/@comment-25501246-20200915155212/@comment-4641958-20200919091046

"What's the point of showing characters talking if that can be conveyed through text?""The whole point of images is to show things that text cannot."

then that same logic can be applied to many other images. For example, if a text perfectly describes deku hitting Shigaraki in the face, an image showing deku hitting Shigaraki in the face shows absolutely nothing new no matter how dynamic it may be. It helps to understand the context and the situation a little better, but the same happens with images that show calmer situations. For example:

https://bokunoheroacademia.fandom.com/wiki/File:Soga,_Rapt_and_Moyuru_are_interrogated.png

Yeah, they are speaking in an interrogation, but from their expressions we can be seen perfectly that each one behaves in a different way (Moyuru is nervous, Rapt does not take the situation seriously and is goofing around, and Soga doesn't give a damn)

https://bokunoheroacademia.fandom.com/wiki/File:Koichi_is_camped_out_on_a_nearby_roof.png

Yes, it's just Koichi reflecting his thoughts, but from the expression on his face, it perfectly helps to reflect the character's mood (he is concerned about the whole situation).

I know that dynamic images are more eye-catching than static images, but also long texts with images are more eye-catching than long texts without any.

Be honest, if you have two texts that talk about the same topic (with the same words, the same lines, etc ...) At first glance, which is it that you would be more willing in reading, the one with images or the one with nothing?