My Hero Academia Law Book talk:Requesting of User Rights

Rule Changes
I disagree that the rules should be changed to include discord blocks, including the fact that this was done without a proper discussion. TheHaloVeteran (talk) 12:50, May 8, 2018 (UTC)

why should any admin add what ever they want to the rules, it should be something decided by everyone, or atleast all the admins not just one admin. Plus no one yet agreed with this new rule.

Kakarots (talk) 17:26, May 9, 2018 (UTC)Kakarots

I understand both of your concerns. There's an obvious problem with communication as a whole on the wiki. Everyone appears to be or has carried out their own agenda rather working to that of the wki's goals. That problem lies with us admins. Hopefully this will lead to more community involed diccusions. As for the changes, I'm on the fence about it. Yes, there should of been a dicussion for the changes and as for the inclusion of discord blocks. After some dicussion I understand why it was included but I have haven't decided if I agree with it. 18:54, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

What was the motivation behind these changes? The existing wiki-specific prerequisites seem sufficiently rigorous as-is, and there's no reliable mapping between Wikia accounts and Discord accounts, so I'm not sure what's gained by adding these additional constraints, or how they'd be enforced. puxlit (talk) 12:11, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

I also agree that rules changes should require at least majority decision among the admins before being added. No individual admin should be able to make large rule changes. I also agree that the added rule be removed until a majority decision is reached. Damage3245 (talk) 16:32, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

"Large rule changes" A user who has any sort of user rights should be an exemplary model among others. It doesn't matter if you make x required edits, if you can't communicate well with others or know how to behave in general, then you shouldn't have any sort of rights. Nothing has actually been changed, the previous rule was "you must not have any bans" The chat is part of the wiki. It was expanded upon to close any loopholes. Those who demonstrate good behavior should have nothing to worry about, only people who are causing problems would have a reason to object Roranoa Drake II (talk)

My thoughts on this.... I think we should all come together to make decisions that affect the entire wiki. We have Discord now (That everyone should be active on) to make decisions too. This new Discord ban rule has already been in affect, since its says "no ban history". Maybe we should have put "of any kind" to the end of that, but you get what I mean. There's a lot of rules and guidelines on this wiki that have loopholes that we are trying to fix. (Especially when trying to organize the Law Book. GamerTimeUS (talk) 22:49, May 10, 2018 (UTC)