Thread:Megistos86/@comment-25501246-20200915155212/@comment-25501246-20200918232426

But the images do not make the articles more interesting, because they themselves are not interesting. What's the point of showing characters talking if that can be conveyed through text?

The whole point of images is to show things that text cannot. This is why the more visuals the better, because those images with static characters talking with empty speech bubbles are not really illustrating anything.

We had lots of them during the early wiki days, but they've been mostly relegated to image gallery since we didn't bother deleting them. The actual pages use far better images.