Thread:Dragonus Nesha/@comment-2168633-20170817185855/@comment-26500386-20170819142139

This entire page has become an absolute joke, with very clear and transparent Transphobia on display, and you can cover it up as much as you like, but anyone with a shread of decency can see it. YTell me, if my sources are biased and not good enough, why did you not go out of your way to look up more information? Confirmation bias, I beleive, on display at it's finest.

And No, There was no conifmration bias within my articles. I avoided this by specifically stating what confirmation bias is, therefore proving that I am aware of the way the human brain works, and went out of my way to find, at least to the best of my ability, neutral articles. Very difficult when we're dealing with people who refuse to simply accept science that is right in front of them. I acknowled the existance of confirmation bias, which therefore proves that I was avoiding such a bias to the best of my ability.

This whole discussion page is literally just - And I'll put it exactly how it is - A transphobic attempt to prevent identified gender (Which we've proven time and time and time again that is based within the brian, not the body, but you simply refuse to listemn or research it yourself) from being put onto the Wiki. You have lied, mislead, created false information, even formulated some sort of ship story to justify this utter disrespect towards gender identity and transgender people as a whole. You have outright said you would not even speak to a person who identified as non binary, further proving your bigotry. When presented with a person who came and proved they identieid as such, you outright stated that you wouldn't speak to them. Furthermore, I have seen very little evidence provided in your arguments of evidence presented past 2016, when all of this became an issue. Along with going against the consensus that has been made several times, and even against admins by editing the wiki against their wishes simply because you disagree or are ignorant on gender and identity

There is, in my honest opinion, absoutely no reason why you should be taken seriously, or even acknowledge from this point onward, since you have proven to be unable to research a subject you argue one to fit with your world veiw, and further seek to outright hide the transgender facts about Magne. It is becoming clear to me outright confirmation of Magne's gender identity wouldn't change your mind, and the only reason you accept Magne's is due to a sex reassignment surgery (Which is called Sex reassignment, not gender reassignment, but lets not let facts get in the way of reality here.)

Your stance on homosexuals is also leaving VERY much to be desired. I'm assuming you have never heard of the "Straight Gay" trope - It means that a person who is gay looks like a straight person - Kind of how it is usually in real life. There is no way to "Draw" Gay people. That mere idea is honestly stomach churning to me. Not only that, your arguments are filled with logical fallicies.

That whole " anthropologist" deal was a joke. An Anthrololistist isn't paid to research resturants. A scientist is paid to studey gender and biological sex. What your anaology was like was like saying "Men are stronger than women" by comparing a 6'5 male bodybuilder to a newborn baby girl - That's not even close to fair, and you're fully aware of it.

With what he's revealed - And called attention to many times (A fact you're very keen to hjust ignore, but I'm going to bring attention to it once again) Horikoshi wants us to refer to Magne as a female.

For all we know (Since you like this argument so much) Magne COULD be a female, just with a masculine body.

This is an idea I (Personally, not accounting for spending an hour reading every word)  haven't seen mentioned, and that would totally render this whole debate meaningless.

My question is this - If we remove the entire idea of trangenderism from this debate, what evidence do you have to suggest that Magne is not a biological female in the first place, since every single character, bar Overhaul, refers to her as female? Twice even mentioned that he "Skimmed over her appearence"

Again, proof only more of your ignorance to this particular subject. You were so very quick to try and prove people you disagreed with wrong through false flags and misinformation that you didn't even take this idea into consideration - Admittedly, I'm as guilty as anyone else is for this particular fault, I will own up to my mistake there.

Frankly, after all this, I am honestly amazed that you're even still allowed to edit on the wiki anymore. After what I've seen, I do question that decision.